Rubric category scores submitted after a performance and approved before responses open.
Score Admin
Performance-Day Score Administration
Morgan is a Chapter Admin here. This is Olivia Grant's submitted score, opened for an audited correction; Morgan is not entering a personal score.
Reviewer Submission
Outstanding Lead
Maya Chen (Iris Vale)
Active Rubric
Stage PresenceVoting Day Score Administration
Chapter Admin view of reviewer Voting Day submissions, deltas, justification status, and approval state.
Olivia Grant / The Lantern Room
Adjudicator Oversight
Performance-day scores, performance responses, and Voting Day scores are separate workflows with separate statuses.
Written performance responses, also called show responses or performance reviews, with reviewer and adjudicator statuses.
Final score adjustments for eligible reviewers, approved separately before awards.
Scores assigned performances, then submits performance responses after score approval.
Takes attendance, scores as an adjudicator, approves reviewer scores, and reviews performance responses.
Manages the reviewing team, school/performance information, and nominations.
Performance-Day Score Submissions
Season Recap Matrix
The recap keeps the table data, adds pinned exception summaries, and makes long score-breakdowns easier to slice before opening details.
Performance matrix
Season Performance Schedule
Everyone in the season can see the performance schedule. When the user is a Show Director, their managed performance is highlighted without limiting the rest of the list.
2025-26 BRG Schedule
Season-wide pageMorgan's Show Director performance. School/performance details, nominees, and documents are managed in the Show Director workspace.
Chapter Admin Dashboard
Chapter Admin can inspect, unlock, approve, and edit on behalf of other users. This role does not submit personal scores.
Admin Priorities
4 openOpen the approved reviewer score, make an audited correction, and relock it.
Inspect final deltas and justification notes before awards calculations.
Adjudicators review submitted performance responses; Chapter Admin can monitor and intervene.
Show Director Dashboard
Show Director manages school/performance information, nominations, the school reviewing team, assigned review visits, and Show Response scores, text, and status. This role cannot score.
The Lantern Room
Approved for scoringAvery Patel is submitted; add the design responsibility note.
Evan was rescheduled to a replacement show; Daniel was excused with no replacement. Neither is absent.
Replacement PDF is queued for chapter admin review.
Reviewing Team Assignments
Full 8-person student reviewing team; Show Response details included| Student reviewer | Visits | Attendance | Schedule change | Show Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sofia LopezHarbor Lights, Garden of Stars, Second Bell | 3 | 3 attended | None |
Submitted · 92
Text: Strong pacing notes with clear evidence. |
| Evan BrooksA Winter's Map, Garden of Stars | 2 | 1 attended; 1 rescheduled | Rescheduled to Garden of Stars |
Not due yet
Text: Due after replacement show is attended. |
| Daniel ReeseSecond Bell, Harbor Lights, The Paper Moon | 3 | 2 attended; 1 excused | Excused; no replacement |
Submitted · 84
Text: Focused ensemble notes; no response due for excused visit. |
| Priya NairThe Paper Moon, Almost Midnight, Garden of Stars | 3 | 3 attended | None |
Needs revision · 78
Text: Add specific design evidence before adjudicator approval. |
| Nadia Kim4 assigned shows | 4 | 4 attended | None |
Approved · 95
Text: Detailed acting and staging observations. |
| Marcus Bell3 assigned shows | 3 | 3 attended | None |
Submitted · 88
Text: Balanced comments on vocals and pacing. |
| Lena Ortiz2 assigned shows | 2 | 2 attended | None |
Approved · 90
Text: Clear technical notes with examples. |
| Sam Rivera2 assigned shows | 2 | 2 attended | None |
Submitted · 87
Text: Short but complete performance response. |
Generalized Rubric Platform
Glamies remains the primary implementation, while the same model can support other rubric-based events with owners, takers, adjudicators, scoring windows, and audit rules.
Core Objects
Glamies-Specific Rules That Should Stay First-Class
- Behavior-level scoring rolls into 0-100 category scores.
- Performance-day scores and Voting Day adjustments are separate states.
- Reviewer scores, adjudicator scores, and recap calculations are related but not interchangeable.
- Attendance and eligibility decide which users appear in scoring queues.
- Disqualification and nominee eligibility need audit visibility, not hidden cleanup.